Fix for #37 - disjunction expression should not produce inner join - left outer join instead

This commit is contained in:
Rob Bygrave
2014-05-18 21:17:19 +12:00
parent 5b98d82f58
commit 08602afcff
45 changed files with 956 additions and 331 deletions
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
package com.avaje.ebeaninternal.api;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import java.util.TreeSet;
import com.avaje.ebeaninternal.server.deploy.BeanProperty;
import com.avaje.ebeaninternal.server.deploy.BeanPropertyAssocMany;
import com.avaje.ebeaninternal.server.el.ElPropertyDeploy;
import com.avaje.ebeaninternal.server.query.SplitName;
import com.avaje.ebeaninternal.server.query.SqlJoinType;
/**
* Holds the joins needs to support the many where predicates.
@@ -17,12 +19,32 @@ public class ManyWhereJoins implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -6490181101871795417L;
private final TreeSet<String> joins = new TreeSet<String>();
private final TreeMap<String,PropertyJoin> joins = new TreeMap<String,PropertyJoin>();
private StringBuilder formulaProperties = new StringBuilder();
private boolean formulaWithJoin;
/**
* 'Mode' indicating that joins added while this is true are required to be outer joins.
*/
private boolean requireOuterJoins;
/**
* Return the current 'mode' indicating if outer joins are currently required or not.
*/
public boolean isRequireOuterJoins() {
return requireOuterJoins;
}
/**
* Set the 'mode' to be that joins added are required to be outer joins.
* This is set during the evaluation of disjunction predicates.
*/
public void setRequireOuterJoins(boolean requireOuterJoins) {
this.requireOuterJoins = requireOuterJoins;
}
/**
* Add a many where join.
*/
@@ -34,10 +56,10 @@ public class ManyWhereJoins implements Serializable {
join = addManyToJoin(join, p.getName());
}
if (join != null){
joins.add(join);
addJoin(join);
String secondaryTableJoinPrefix = p.getSecondaryTableJoinPrefix();
if (secondaryTableJoinPrefix != null) {
joins.add(join+"."+secondaryTableJoinPrefix);
addJoin(join+"."+secondaryTableJoinPrefix);
}
addParentJoins(join);
}
@@ -58,11 +80,16 @@ public class ManyWhereJoins implements Serializable {
private void addParentJoins(String join) {
String[] split = SplitName.split(join);
if (split[0] != null){
joins.add(split[0]);
addJoin(split[0]);
addParentJoins(split[0]);
}
}
private void addJoin(String property) {
SqlJoinType joinType = (requireOuterJoins) ? SqlJoinType.OUTER: SqlJoinType.INNER;
joins.put(property, new PropertyJoin(property, joinType));
}
/**
* Return true if there are no extra many where joins.
*/
@@ -73,10 +100,22 @@ public class ManyWhereJoins implements Serializable {
/**
* Return the set of many where joins.
*/
public Set<String> getJoins() {
return joins;
public Collection<PropertyJoin> getPropertyJoins() {
return joins.values();
}
/**
* Return the set of property names for the many where joins.
*/
public TreeSet<String> getPropertyNames() {
TreeSet<String> propertyNames = new TreeSet<String>();
for (PropertyJoin join : joins.values()) {
propertyNames.add(join.getProperty());
}
return propertyNames;
}
/**
* In findRowCount query found a formula property with a join clause so building a select clause
* specifically for the findRowCount query.